+- CarTechnoloGY (https://cartechnology.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Discussions All about Software and Hardware (https://cartechnology.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=310)
+--- Forum: Automotive Help & Discussions / Software and Hardware (https://cartechnology.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=40)
+---- Forum: BMW - Mini - Rolls Royce (https://cartechnology.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=61)
+---- Thread: Secure coding in BMWs (unit list) (/showthread.php?tid=75725)
RE: Secure codings in SDP 4.40.12 - Node - 26-02-2023
(26-02-2023, 17:16 PM)st1 Wrote: Thought the latest per below threads was 4.40.11?
Just updated G82 to 4.40.11 with no issues, was on 4.39.20
It's not: ISTA+ 4.40.1x Install Files - MEGA (cartechnology.co.uk)
RE: Secure codings in SDP 4.40.12 - pillpusher84 - 26-02-2023
(26-02-2023, 16:13 PM)Node Wrote: OOPS, I020 data are new, so I did not notice that. Will add and reupload.
I020 added. Yes, MGU_02 is now secure coding in I020 :/
AFAIK offline ISTA will not even start to program/code if no connection to backend when even a single unit is secure coding. But I personally never tried what happens in such case.
Thanks ... I assumed I was up shit's creek as I saw MGU_02 was SC in the 7er, but wanted to validate before I let BMW service touch my car.
RE: Secure codings in SDP 4.40.12 - smilo - 26-02-2023
Is there a solution to get the backend validation by any way ?
If not, it does mean that's the beginning of the end of FDL coding ?
RE: Secure codings in SDP 4.40.12 - Mwahab - 27-02-2023
Some people has access and can do secure coding in china.
RE: Secure codings in SDP 4.40.12 - Elf11 - 27-02-2023
(27-02-2023, 01:29 AM)Mwahab Wrote: Some people has access and can do secure coding in china.
Source of this statement?
RE: Secure codings in SDP 4.40.12 - FSCmap - 27-02-2023
(26-02-2023, 22:21 PM)smilo Wrote: Is there a solution to get the backend validation by any way ?
If not, it does mean that's the beginning of the end of FDL coding ?
FDL coding is not possible for such units, but FA coding is already possible and works well using our own solution. Maybe we will introduce this feature for *active* users of our portal someday...
RE: Secure codings in SDP 4.40.12 - jonny81 - 27-02-2023
nice great news
RE: Secure codings in SDP 4.40.12 - Mwahab - 27-02-2023
(27-02-2023, 03:07 AM)Elf11 Wrote:(27-02-2023, 01:29 AM)Mwahab Wrote: Some people has access and can do secure coding in china.
Source of this statement?
Do you need more sources after what Mr.Vit and Johnny said?
RE: Secure codings in SDP 4.40.12 - TheNine90 - 27-02-2023
And this solution allows FDL coding? Using esys?
RE: Secure codings in SDP 4.40.12 - Elf11 - 27-02-2023
(27-02-2023, 18:05 PM)Mwahab Wrote:(27-02-2023, 03:07 AM)Elf11 Wrote:(27-02-2023, 01:29 AM)Mwahab Wrote: Some people has access and can do secure coding in china.
Source of this statement?
Do you need more sources after what Mr.Vit and Johnny said?
Well that's no source at all. Just another statement. Don't get me wrong, I'd like to have a working solution for FDL coding but it's just not possible except you have the missing coding files and keys