[yarickoff]

Hello,
no i didn't get any help from the original programmer, i wrote it. I got help with a problem, though, at pshoey. He helped me. I'm not ashamed of that. I don't share programs because others earn money with them.
I don't trust anyone anymore.
I only trust Pshoey and Intel123. Both get everything from me.
Then there are people who can only write and report negatively.
So, that's my point. Sorry, I've been thinking that way for a while.

Sorry for my english.

There's no logic to your argument and its reasoning. In fact, it's counter-intuitive: "not sharing applications so vendors cannot monetize them" is a fallacy. Your actions only further support the opposite of your wanted goal and benefit the current vendors even more. All you are doing is limiting the "market" so to speak: if there are is a limited supply of a product or a service ("the solution") vendors can then charge more for it since it's not publicly accessible. Your closely guarded secret is simply making more money for everyone else.

Instead, consider this scenario: share applications and publicize them as much as you can, this way everyone has access to them without having to pay for them in the first place. This will then balance the market, and individuals who require assistance will more often pay for a service, and those who are comfortable implementing their own solutions can benefit from choice (an open market).

Unless, of course, you ARE the vendor and want to monetize your solution (and your post is basically an ad). If that's the case, you are posting in the wrong forum and are clearly being unprofessional.

I don't understand why "everyone" is against people making money, or they think they are the only ones who have the holy grail in their possession. A massive corporation like BMW is not able to even limit access to their solutions (INPA, tool32, WinKFP, NCS, ISTA, ICOM, etc.) for over a decade thanks to many individuals out there who are able to bring these tools to end consumers/users (like myself). That's beneficial for the "rest of us" who want to successfully diagnose and repair our own cars and avoid costly dealership visits. One can even argue that these "publicly available solutions" also benefits BMW in the end: think about that.

Your English is fine, but your reasoning is not.

You reason like a teenager who wants everything for free. When everyone writes that they need a program for personal purposes, in most cases this means that a person will earn money for it. Why then do not you want to pay money to the software manufacturer ?? If everyone gives everything for free, then soon BMW repair will cost 1 euro, and FSC codes 20 cents.