[chang2]

Hello,

here is a current example:

   

[aknight720]

in the last weeks the versions were horrible, nearly everyday a new version because of activation problems. That sucked a lot, it was no careful work in my eyes ,so i switched to esysx

Was not TM's fault that some guys unpacked his software and made their own tokens, he just reacted to the situation and dealt with it the best he could.

[Almaretto]

It has actual CAF mapping data , not always old ones.

Do you find it has newer mapping than TM's Launcher?

[hulahans]

It has actual CAF mapping data , not always old ones.

Do you find it has newer mapping than TM's Launcher?

What shall i do to compare? Only have Esysx installed Laptop dont like both together

[ruben_17non]

I think both have same mapping...

[Almaretto]

It has actual CAF mapping data , not always old ones.

Do you find it has newer mapping than TM's Launcher?

What shall i do to compare? Only have Esysx installed Laptop dont like both together

You could compare using TM's NCD / CAFD tool vs EsysX.

Check any of the following: CAFD_000570E, CAFD_00005710, CAFD_000207C, CAFD_0000225A (Group 3000), or latest BDC_Body files (CAFD_000017BC_103_041_031 (Section 3041)).

[jaki]

I also switched to esysx, fast and accurate support. Thumb up

[RReader]

Hi ,

I won't pretend to an expert of Esys , but I use E-sys launcher Pro daily long ago and more than a year in the EsysX since I use Gkoukou solution long ago ( more than 5 years ).

To be honest , I'm always grateful to have token master's solution , but as you may understand it's like I use AMD in all of my desktops and Intel® in all of my laptops , the purpose is to have balance but to compare which one is better , many may tell you that the Intel CPU got better performance than the AMD , but I actually prefer the AMD more and won't choose Intel if it's a desktop again .

Since 3.27.1 , I actually prefer EsysX much more and using it most of the time (now the 3.30.1), do you do programming by Esys a lot ? if you did than you probably get my feel because EsysX handles the memory better , it's actually much stable and faster in my opinion , I can't prove this cause I'm not a programmer nor a software expert , it just my experience , although I didn't do the latest launcher Pro update since lots of issue were reported .

RReader

[simonchs]

Esysx has much more better support, not waiting weeks or months for answer.Activation process easier.
It has actual CAF mapping data , not always old ones.
FDL cheat sheets, and you can make very easy scripts for your desired coding, without having knowledge of java.

And it has no Expiry date!

For me it was a good change to use Esysx

May I know if the FDL cheat sheets “compatible” with Launcher?

[kmbeatz]

How much Cost it?