[Almaretto]

3.32 is much quicker for coding. If you use the external app for clearing faults and such stick to 3.27.1.

I do use external transmitter and storage info. So, I stick to 3.27.1.

[RocketSurgeon]

Do you find any advantage to use 3.32? I still stick to 3.27.1 for all coding functionality.

I use 3.27.1 for the same reasons as you. I noticed that launcher felt quicker and more responsive than EsysX, and I attribute that difference to 64-bit java. With EsysX it loads a little slower and hangs for a couple seconds when saving a modified CAFD even on a very fast laptop. It works great, speed just increases my confidence. I suppose I don't need to run 3.32 to enjoy the benefits of 64-bit, as long as I can swap Java 8 into 3.27.1
I donated for Launcher, I'm hoping Tokenmaster finds some time to issue licenses. I can certainly understand his frustration.

[Kuiyt2]

Do you find any advantage to use 3.32? I still stick to 3.27.1 for all coding functionality.

I use 3.27.1 for the same reasons as you. I noticed that launcher felt quicker and more responsive than EsysX, and I attribute that difference to 64-bit java. With EsysX it loads a little slower and hangs for a couple seconds when saving a modified CAFD even on a very fast laptop. It works great, speed just increases my confidence. I suppose I don't need to run 3.32 to enjoy the benefits of 64-bit, as long as I can swap Java 8 into 3.27.1
I donated for Launcher, I'm hoping Tokenmaster finds some time to issue licenses. I can certainly understand his frustration.

I do not believe even if TokenMaster wanted to return he could. I know he has a history of going dark for 1-2 months at a time. This time he has been gone too long and it seems like he has an absurd amount of backlog from all the complaints, I doubt with his day job (I assume with his skill set he does something successful) he’ll be able to come back and clear the backlog so my personal guess is he is gone for good.

[RocketSurgeon]

A few members here got licenses as recently as October of 2018. I just wish I put in sooner for Launcher Pro, but I only bought my first F-series in October. I'm still holding out hope because he makes an awesome product.

[gkoukou]

Support for 64-bits Java is on its way.
Beta testing right now. Should be available soon.

That's exciting, does that mean support for newer versions of E-sys like 3.32?

Support for 64 bits Java has been released
As a matter of fact EsysX64 supports only Esys 64 bits versions 3.32.1 & 3.33.0

Regards,
George

[hulahans]

Support for 64-bits Java is on its way.
Beta testing right now. Should be available soon.

That's exciting, does that mean support for newer versions of E-sys like 3.32?

Support for 64 bits Java has been released
As a matter of fact EsysX64 supports only Esys 64 bits versions 3.32.1 & 3.33.0

Regards,
George

Very nice. will test it

[Deimis]

Is it possible to generate 2019-1 evo map code ID4 with new update from F0?

Thank you

[ultimate]

Hi
Did someone read the third series G20?
Some blocks in the "points" by FDL-Coding
Specifically - KOMBI (High or 6W) and HU (MGU)
use Launcher v3 E-Sys 3.33 (3.33.1)
So understand - there is still no solution?

[kmodel99]

Anyone have link to EsysPlus 3.x? Or when I can buy it?

[muskatas]

Is it possible to generate 2019-1 evo map code ID4 with new update from F0?

Thank you

Yes