Unfortunately we do not accept new members for free, Now Registration cost 30€, if you are interesting Send Email to [email protected]
Multiplexer c4 VS Multi-Diag Access j2534 Pass-Thru
|
10-10-2018, 05:13 AM,
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Multiplexer c4 VS Multi-Diag Access j2534 Pass-Thru
Hello guys.
Are there differences in the function with the different interface? Use with the Xentry software. Can someone tell me his experience? thanks |
|||
|
![[+]](https://cartechnology.co.uk/images/CarTechnologyTheCure/collapse_collapsed.png)
|
20-10-2018, 20:05 PM,
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Multiplexer c4 VS Multi-Diag Access j2534 Pass-Thru
The c4 is original mercedes diagnostic interface (clone). If you use j2534 pass-thru interface you able to diagnostic less model from mercedes. I think the pass-thru is not work on older mercedes like w202 w210 etc...
|
|||
|
|
|
31-10-2018, 19:51 PM,
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Multiplexer c4 VS Multi-Diag Access j2534 Pass-Thru
Thanks
Functions are not restricted? Can I use the developer function? I want to use it for a W639. |
|||
|
|
|
04-11-2018, 21:48 PM,
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Multiplexer c4 VS Multi-Diag Access j2534 Pass-Thru
With j2534 pass-thru developer functions are not restricted, but you can fall into errors in connection with ECUs in W639 in case you will use pass-thru device. In my case in all w203's only MSG(CDI or ME) gave response with PassThru. So C4 is much more usefull.
|
|||
|
|
|
05-11-2018, 22:49 PM,
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Multiplexer c4 VS Multi-Diag Access j2534 Pass-Thru
ok thanks, i will test it and report it.
|
|||
|
|
|
18-12-2018, 12:12 PM,
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Multiplexer c4 VS Multi-Diag Access j2534 Pass-Thru
they are both Sh** the C4 who you looking for is bad Quality
|
|||
|
|
19-12-2018, 12:15 PM,
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Multiplexer c4 VS Multi-Diag Access j2534 Pass-Thru
|
|||
|
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content
