Unfortunately we do not accept new members for free, Now Registration cost 30€, if you are interesting Send Email to [email protected]
BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
15-04-2022, 18:48 PM,
Post: #81
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
|
|||
15-04-2022, 18:53 PM,
Post: #82
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
(15-04-2022, 18:48 PM) marcdts Wrote: Trying to compare to CAFDs from diferent cars ( both from bdc ,same cafd main number) shows not posible Right now, must be same exact version. I spoke with support about this. They are changing it to allow comparison where ID and Major version are same. Subversion and Patch version can differ. 2018 F06 Alpina B6 650ix GC; Space Grey; Vermillion Red Nappa Leather; Executive; B&O; Driving Assistant 2017 F15 X5 xDrive50i MSport; Glacier Silver Metallic; Black Dakota Leather; Executive; B&O; Driving Assistant; RSE |
|||
15-04-2022, 19:46 PM,
Post: #83
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
Can't configure remote icom to read errors. Through enet works without problems. In general, the program is impressive!
|
|||
15-04-2022, 21:11 PM,
Post: #84
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
(15-04-2022, 18:48 PM)marcdts Wrote:Update is coming soon to allow this.(14-04-2022, 00:03 AM)Rob@BU Wrote:(13-04-2022, 21:30 PM)krug Wrote: and what about 'save as fwl'? |
|||
15-04-2022, 22:54 PM,
Post: #85
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
I’ve been using BU for a while first as a beta tester and its come a long way since than, for me it’s mainly important that it supports new mapping, but other functions are super nice, any way support is great and always up for suggestions in making the software even better.
Sure everyone got their own taste on how the software should look, main thing is it does the job that no other software does which is supports latest mapping… |
|||
16-04-2022, 00:46 AM,
Post: #86
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
(15-04-2022, 21:11 PM)Rob@BU Wrote:(15-04-2022, 18:48 PM)marcdts Wrote:Update is coming soon to allow this.(14-04-2022, 00:03 AM)Rob@BU Wrote:(13-04-2022, 21:30 PM)krug Wrote: and what about 'save as fwl'? Looking forward to adding "quick code script function" |
|||
16-04-2022, 00:54 AM,
Post: #87
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
(16-04-2022, 00:46 AM)GaryWu Wrote:(15-04-2022, 21:11 PM)Rob@BU Wrote:(15-04-2022, 18:48 PM)marcdts Wrote:Update is coming soon to allow this.(14-04-2022, 00:03 AM)Rob@BU Wrote:(13-04-2022, 21:30 PM)krug Wrote: and what about 'save as fwl'? Coming soon |
|||
16-04-2022, 08:44 AM,
Post: #88
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
For remote coding still Teamviewer is needed?!
|
|||
16-04-2022, 09:57 AM,
Post: #89
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
I still use teamviewer and remote enet to port forward. Works fine.
|
|||
16-04-2022, 10:02 AM,
(This post was last modified: 16-04-2022, 10:06 AM by Esysx.)
Post: #90
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
(16-04-2022, 08:44 AM)hulahans Wrote: For remote coding still Teamviewer is needed?!Maybe not for much longer (16-04-2022, 09:57 AM)bennymx Wrote: I still use teamviewer and remote enet to port forward. Works fine. Hope Enet helper works good for you |
|||
Reputation: +1 - PsevDo [+1] | |||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread:
8 Guest(s)
8 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content