[Node]

Unless ISTA failed to code it ESys will code it to the same config as ISTA did. Question is why it's incorrect! And for that there can be two reasons: error in KIS data or wrong car FA.

[ferbmw]

Unless ISTA failed to code it ESys will code it to the same config as ISTA did. Question is why it's incorrect! And for that there can be two reasons: error in KIS data or wrong car FA.

Thanks Node. As I mentioned I never ever modified FA. Last 5 programing sesions with ISTA went Ok, with no issues at all. I presume, as you say, KIS error.

[Node]

Was ACSM flashed/coded in those last 5 sessions?

[ferbmw]

Was ACSM flashed/coded in those last 5 sessions?

if not all, in most of them

[ferbmw]

Unless ISTA failed to code it ESys will code it to the same config as ISTA did. Question is why it's incorrect! And for that there can be two reasons: error in KIS data or wrong car FA.

Coded out with Esys, same problem. Clear error codes with Esys trasmiter after code and re checked with ISTA, same errors as OP.

[ferbmw]

update, 

flashed with esys, according to Shawns intructions , and nothing, same two errors as OP.

[Node]

I really don't understand what you expect... The only way Esys could solve it is if ISTA did something really wrong. Which does not really seem to be the case.

---

P.S. New psdzdata was shared today so need to try that. Either with Esys or ISTA.

[Bluposeidon]

It happened to me with a 2020 g21 a week ago, fixed with latest psdzdata ,E-Sys3.36.2  and tool32: acsm5.prg-job-STEUERN-ARGUMENT: ARG.VERRIEGELUNG_SG:0

PS: my acsm was new.

[ferbmw]

It happened to me with a 2020 g21 a week ago, fixed with latest psdzdata ,E-Sys3.36.2  and tool32: acsm5.prg-job-STEUERN-ARGUMENT: ARG.VERRIEGELUNG_SG:0

PS: my acsm was new.

Hi, which number of psdzdata did you use? 

Thanks

[Bluposeidon]

4.34.10
https://cartechnology.co.uk/showthread.p...t=psdzdata