[Metal]

For installing my new midpipe i just created a modified FA for ROW and ё_5у5 created a small TAL which only contains swdeploy and cddeploy of DME_BAC2 and RAM. As i don´t need an upgraded RAM i will only flash DME with that SWFK and let ё5у5 VO-code the CAFD.

   

As there seems to be no further ECU involved, nothing has to be done or coded in addition. Am i right?

[Mattyemme]

Yes only flash DME and code DME with OEM FA for don't have issue with OPF data....but put CS file...it's better guys

[sqorpius]

Correct, just remove 1DF and calculate TAL. Like Mattyemme says, code the DME with original FA and not the one without 1DF.

[Metal]

Just for understanding, would you please explain, why shall i code with original FA?

---

Yes only flash DME and code DME with OEM FA for don't have issue with OPF data....but put CS file...it's better guys

Yes, i will proceed with CS afterwards. But first i would like to try a simple OPF Delete without downgrading BTLD to 035.

[MichaelNRW]

Because otherwise there´s a difference between DKOMBI8 and DME, which will result in an error.

[Metal]

Because otherwise there´s a difference between DKOMBI8 and DME, which will result in an error.

Thx, now i understand why a colleague said, i can´t do it without coding DKOMBI8.
As i don´t want to do it, because i don´t have a signed CAFD, i avoid the error, with VO-coding DME with original FA.
Is this also valid, when using C029 SWFK for CS-ROW ?

[Mattyemme]

Because otherwise there´s a difference between DKOMBI8 and DME, which will result in an error.

Thx, now i understand why a colleague said, i can´t do it without coding DKOMBI8.
As i don´t want to do it, because i don´t have a signed CAFD, i avoid the error, with VO-coding DME with original FA.
Is this also valid, when using C029 SWFK for CS-ROW ?

Code DME with oem FA only if you flash non opf file...or if you want code dkombi without 1DF in ncd 2.0....simply recode DME oem FA

[Thorsten]

Because otherwise there´s a difference between DKOMBI8 and DME, which will result in an error.

...with you method is a difference between software and coding, like @Mattyemme wrote.


Thorsten

[MichaelNRW]

...with you method is a difference between software and coding, like @Mattyemme wrote.

What?
I never mentioned any method of doing this.
Just answered the question:

Just for understanding, would you please explain, why shall i code with original FA?

[DavidVSP]

At least in my experience, whenever you flash ROW software without DKOMBI coding (on ID8), the "рдятiculate filter maintenance" error appears after just a few start-up cycles, even if you've coded the DME with the stock VO.

---

Just for understanding, would you please explain, why shall i code with original FA?

---

Yes only flash DME and code DME with OEM FA for don't have issue with OPF data....but put CS file...it's better guys

Yes, i will proceed with CS afterwards. But first i would like to try a simple OPF Delete without downgrading BTLD to 035.

No need downgrading BTLD now, only need the CS f5с.