[MOMOSAM]

@momosam software version is 99/99, seems odd https://i.imgur.com/Vn0jlbI.png

@mercedessd So we should order a valvebody + module together, or try to get a valvebody that isn't one of the EHS #'s above? We heard that you only need to replace valve body and module together if its a VGS-NAG1 not VGS-NAG2(what we are working with)

you need to scan the EGS and go to control module version in DAS and send picture of the full details mate.

Ok, that will be tomorrow. Its ETC however, but probably same thing.

---

Talked with a friend from MB dealer, he thinks that this 2006 209.475 should be a 722.6 not a 722.9 . I have been manually picking 722.9 because of my customer. Could also be the issue. However valve body was not replaced.
Edit: N/m, its 722.9...pan fill not dipstick on passenger side.

I checked your vin and it is correct 722.9 mate

[mercedessd]

see photos, is confirmed 722.9 and also that this valvebody cannot accept the "repair"

[MOMOSAM]

see photos, is confirmed 722.9 and also that this valvebody cannot accept the "repair"

But also suggests that the EHS can be repaired... in other words change the EHS number

[mercedessd]

see photos, is confirmed 722.9 and also that this valvebody cannot accept the "repair"

But also suggests that the EHS can be repaired... in other words change the EHS number

this is not the proper repair, I have seen this number changed in Dev mode to force coding, the transmission did not perform well or have good shifting characteristics. for personal vehicle is at one's own discretion, for customers car the job should be performed properly, correctly.

[connector]

Just successfully finished that job, thanks for all the advice. Lesson learned : Use EPC, don't trust the parts guy 8)