Unfortunately we do not accept new members for free, Now Registration cost 30€, if you are interesting Send Email to [email protected]
BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
|
21-05-2022, 00:30 AM,
Post: #201
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
|
|||
|
![[Image: Bimmer-Utility_edited.png]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/95a145_4c8e86933b69499ab72d82cfc03d6b27~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_376,h_80,al_c,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/Bimmer-Utility_edited.png)
![[+]](https://cartechnology.co.uk/images/CarTechnologyTheCure/collapse_collapsed.png)
|
25-05-2022, 15:11 PM,
Post: #202
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
Hi Rob,
I also having troubles reading FSC from entrynav. DTC work but FSC giving me error "Data could not be retreived" etc. I work on bench |
|||
|
|
|
27-05-2022, 04:31 AM,
Post: #203
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
Reading dtc codes not working in my case
Also latest cafds not mapped PLEASE ALLOW TO FDL NEW CAFDS EVEN WHEN YOU NOT UPDATED PROGRAM Its very annoying new soft appeared few days ago but we cant fdl as not covered I have esys plus and Im able to fdl every cafds even if they not properly mapped |
|||
| Reputation: +1 - Twointje [+1] | |||
|
|
|
28-05-2022, 17:09 PM,
Post: #204
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
Same here as some of previous users: DTC clear causes clousure of BU (remote and on site).
Is BU supporting Esys 3.40 ? |
|||
|
|
|
28-05-2022, 17:30 PM,
(This post was last modified: 28-05-2022, 17:36 PM by Rob@BU.)
Post: #205
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
(28-05-2022, 17:09 PM)oros Wrote: Same here as some of previous users: DTC clear causes clousure of BU (remote and on site). Yes BU Supports 3.40.0 and 3.40.1 PM Sent (27-05-2022, 04:31 AM)masa52 Wrote: Reading dtc codes not working in my casePM Sent CAFD mapping is mapped to 4.35.21, .31 was just released days ago and will be mapped in next update. Mapping of brand new CAFD's instead of being unmapped entirely, will be initially mapped using last known mapping until full mapping of new CAFD is updated. |
|||
| Reputation: +1 - Toytoy190 [+1] | |||
|
|
|
28-05-2022, 20:38 PM,
Post: #206
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
|
|||
|
|
|
29-05-2022, 00:04 AM,
Post: #207
|
|||
|
|||
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
(28-05-2022, 20:38 PM)masa52 Wrote:(28-05-2022, 17:30 PM)Rob@BU Wrote: Mapping of brand new CAFD's instead of being unmapped entirely, will be initially mapped using last known mapping until full mapping of new CAFD is updated.that would be nice if you make this possible It's coming in our next update , no worries  PM'ed you |
|||
|
|
|
29-05-2022, 07:47 AM,
Post: #208
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
Whats about coding with own easy scripts like in Esysx and other launchers.Will it be implemented?
|
|||
|
|
|
31-05-2022, 05:14 AM,
Post: #209
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
My suggestion
Add option to copy description and werte from NCD compare Add option “refresh” NCD compare |
|||
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 13:55 PM,
Post: #210
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: BimmerUtility vs Esys Launchers
never get an answer for my previous question, not even a remark...
back to e-sys plus then... |
|||
|
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)
3 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content
