[mitch32]

As title, does anyone know if modifying an FA (let’s say for a retrofit, where you change both type code and/or salapa options) and then perform coding per the FA, does that change only the parameters on a FDL or does it actually potentially completely swap to another version of a CAFD?

[Stratofortress]

Coding only adjusts the parameters within the respective .ncd file according to the FA.

[jaramillo]

As title, does anyone know if modifying an FA (let’s say for a retrofit, where you change both type code and/or salapa options) and then perform coding per the FA, does that change only the parameters on a FDL or does it actually potentially completely swap to another version of a CAFD?

It can swap a cafd also, change bootlоаdёя etc..
For example typekey + buildate in a G80 differential module

[bradsm87]

As title, does anyone know if modifying an FA (let’s say for a retrofit, where you change both type code and/or salapa options) and then perform coding per the FA, does that change only the parameters on a FDL or does it actually potentially completely swap to another version of a CAFD?

It can swap a cafd also, change bootlоаdёя etc..
For example typekey + buildate in a G80 differential module

The OP said "and then perform coding per the FA". What you're referring to is calculating SVT target, doing a TAL calculation and TAL execution, which is a lot more than just performing coding.

[mitch32]

I played around a bit and honestly think that there is no way just coding via FA would do anything other than change parameter in the CAFD. You’d have the do a big change to the FA then recalculate the SVT and make a TAL to change the CAFD file to another CAFD file.

[Node]

Unless you are using рдят in the different chassis (series)...

P.S. But then you need at least to inject new CAFD, not just simple coding, which will fail.

[myztic]

It depends on current flashdata in control unit